I didn't say it needs one, only that we have opportunity and it might not be a terrible idea. If "he's Loki" isn't reason enough, then obviously that opportunity isn't being taken.
There is a very big difference between "seeing Loki" and "getting Loki's phone away from him long enough for me to install a tracking device, then returning it without him noticing." We aren't going to get this opportunity again.
One of these people manipulated the Hood into his capture following the Siege of Asgard. The other was running with the Hood at that time and was caught in the same arrest. I mean, really. The Hood.
I'm telling you, you're using small-fry as your basis of comparison here.
That's what I was asking you. We have the opportunity, it is not one we're likely to get again. Though "volatile" may be exaggerating the degree, he is unpredictable. Sometimes that can be mistaken for flakiness, and knowing where is is when we need him could be beneficial.
I'm asking you if it's a good idea because sometimes I need a second opinion instead of just pursuing every idea that pops in my head. If your answer is no, just say no.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
selfequipped) wrote2014-02-10 02:43 pm
text.
text.
text.
text.
text.
text.
text.
text.
text.
text.
I'm telling you, you're using small-fry as your basis of comparison here.
text.
Tampering with his phone or not, trustworthy or not, do you really think it's a good idea to bug Loki's phone when he could be potentially volatile?
text.
I'm asking you if it's a good idea because sometimes I need a second opinion instead of just pursuing every idea that pops in my head. If your answer is no, just say no.
text.
So, the answer is definitely no.
text.
text.