I've got a limited window of opportunity here. Yes, I'm the best means of doing this, but I'm not the only. I'm going to print this, before someone else gets their hands on it or you accidentally spill the beans to any of the scientists.
You're enterprising. I'm sure you'll manage to figure this out even when I do print it.
I don't "accidentally" spill beans. You print this, and I say you don't even know who your source is. That we're back to square one, and without the opportunity to find out more. I gave you the names. That was the deal.
I've got an idea of who the source is. [ no she doesn't. ]
I've been doing a lot of research since last night. You call me out on that, I might just retort with the source's name. Oooh, but then we wouldn't HAVE any more information about the Porter, would we? Care to risk it?
No, it's about correctly informing the imPorts you screwed over last month. This could ruin what little credibility that you have while possibly making it impossible to find out what we can know about this information.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
selfequipped) wrote2014-02-10 02:43 pm
text
You're enterprising. I'm sure you'll manage to figure this out even when I do print it.
text
text
I've been doing a lot of research since last night. You call me out on that, I might just retort with the source's name. Oooh, but then we wouldn't HAVE any more information about the Porter, would we? Care to risk it?
text
text
text
[New conclusion: all people from Baltimore have doctorates in being grown up children.
Sorry, Will.]
text
text
text
text